Sports · Swimming Club

How a Liverpool swimming coach ran 40 juniors as four squad cohorts

Nathan Brooks coordinated 40 junior swimmers across five overlapping WhatsApp groups and a laminated register clipped to a poolside file. Swim England, the sport's national governing body, sets clear expectations for safe, well-organised training environments — and Nathan was spending most of his coaching attention just working out who would turn up. One Bitir cohort per squad fixed that: weekly training attendance rose from 72% to 91% and advance availability for galas from 44% to 90% in a single season.

Published 24 June 2026 9 min read Liverpool, United Kingdom

TL;DR

Nathan Brooks is head coach of a 40-swimmer junior section at Mersey Tigers Swimming Club in Liverpool. For two seasons he ran the whole section on five WhatsApp groups, a paper register, and a stream of last-minute "is your child swimming Saturday?" messages. After splitting the section into four Bitir squad cohorts — development, junior, age-group, and performance — each with its own attendance register, gala-availability poll, and per-swimmer target, weekly training attendance rose from 72% to 91%, advance gala availability from 44% to 90%, and personal-best logging from 23% to 79%. Parent satisfaction rose from 6.5 to 9.1 out of ten, and Nathan's poolside admin fell from about four hours a week to under one. Same swimmers, same pool time, four small squads instead of one crowd.

Nathan Brooks

Head Coach · Mersey Tigers Swimming Club, Liverpool

Where he started

Nathan swam competitively into his early twenties before a shoulder injury moved him onto the poolside. He took his Swim England Level 2 qualification in 2017 and built the junior section at Mersey Tigers from 14 swimmers to 40 over six years, training out of a council leisure-centre pool in south Liverpool with three evening sessions a week.

Forty swimmers is a lot of children to keep organised, and they were not one group. They split naturally into four ability bands — development, junior, age-group, and a small performance squad — each on its own session times.

His coordination ran on whatever was to hand:

It worked at 20 swimmers. At 40 it had quietly stopped working, and Nathan had not noticed because the failure was spread thinly across every week.

The breaking point

The moment came at a county-qualifier gala in early 2025. Nathan had entered a relay team off a WhatsApp thread where four parents had given a thumbs-up. On the day, two of the four did not show — one family had replied "yes" to the wrong week, the other had never seen the message under 60 others. The relay was scratched.

"I'd done everything right and still stood on poolside a swimmer short, because the place I asked parents to confirm was a place nobody could actually find the question."

That was the diagnosis. With everyone in one whole-section chat, no single message stood out, and a yes was indistinguishable from a thumbs-up to someone else's photo. The bigger the section grew, the worse it got — the classic large-group problem where everyone assumes someone else has answered.

"I'd done everything right and still stood on poolside a swimmer short, because the place I asked parents to confirm was a place nobody could find the question."

What he set up in Bitir

Nathan rebuilt the section over a fortnight, deliberately keeping each squad as its own cohort rather than recreating one big group. The structure mirrors the one we set out in our guide to managing groups of different sizes: never one space for the whole crowd.

  1. One private group per squad. Four cohorts of nine to eleven swimmers, each with the parents of that squad and no one else. A development-squad parent no longer wades through performance-squad gala logistics.
  2. A two-minute attendance register. Nathan marks each session in the squad's group in under two minutes, and the term's attendance is visible per swimmer instead of trapped on a laminated sheet.
  3. A gala-availability poll. One structured poll per gala, per squad — available, not available, or unsure — that closes 48 hours before he has to submit entries. He sees a clean count, not a guess.
  4. A per-swimmer target. Each swimmer has a goal card with one personal-best target for the term — a time to beat in their main stroke — visible to that swimmer, their parent, and Nathan.
  5. A squad helper. A team manager parent in each squad has helper rights to chase availability and welcome new families, taking the load Nathan used to carry alone. The roles split follows our leader, helper, member model.

What changed in the numbers

Nathan compared the season before the switch with the one after, across all 40 swimmers.

72% → 91%Weekly training attendance
44% → 90%Advance gala availability confirmed
23% → 79%Swimmers logging personal bests
6.5 → 9.1Parent satisfaction (/10)

The gala number is the one Nathan cares about most, because a scratched relay or an empty lane is a child who trained all term and then didn't get to race. Knowing his availability two clear days out, per squad, ended the poolside guesswork.

What he puts the change down to, in order:

  1. Smaller squad feeds. A question posted to ten families gets answered; the same question posted to forty got lost. Splitting the section was the single biggest lever, not any one feature.
  2. The structured availability poll. A closed poll with a deadline gave him a count he could trust, where a scatter of WhatsApp thumbs-ups never had.
  3. Per-swimmer targets. Once a swimmer could see their own personal-best target and tick off attempts, the older age-group children started turning up to the optional Friday session they used to skip.

What he would tell another sports coach

Nathan's advice to other UK club coaches is direct.

The way Nathan structures availability and attendance per squad draws on the same logic as our guide to the right group size — small enough to be seen, with one manager holding the overview.

What's next

Nathan is rolling the same four-cohort structure out to the club's masters (adult) section next season, and is piloting a shared end-of-term celebration post across all four junior squads so the section still feels like one club even though it trains as four squads. He is also using the term's attendance data, now finally in one place, to make the case to the leisure centre for a fourth weekly pool slot.

Questions we're asked about this case

Does Bitir replace a club's licensing or membership system?

No. Bitir is a private group coaching and communication app for running squads day to day — attendance, availability, targets, and parent updates. It sits alongside whatever club-management or Swim England membership system the club already uses for licensing and registration, rather than replacing it.

How does Bitir handle availability for galas and fixtures?

Each squad gets a structured availability poll per event — available, not available, or unsure — with a closing deadline before entries are due. The coach sees a clean count per swimmer instead of scrolling a chat thread, so relay teams and lane entries are built on confirmations, not guesses.

Can one coach run several squads in Bitir at once?

Yes. A coach sits as manager across all the squad cohorts, with attendance and target progress visible per squad, while each squad runs its own private feed and polls. Parent helpers in each squad share the day-to-day chasing, so one coach can hold a 40-swimmer section without any one group becoming unmanageable.

How much does Bitir cost for a swimming club?

Bitir is free for managers running small private groups, including a single coach running several squad cohorts like Nathan's. Larger plans with multi-coach access and institutional features are available. See Contact for a guided walkthrough.

Coach a large squad or club section?

Run each squad as its own cohort — attendance, gala availability, and per-swimmer targets — with one manager overview across all of them. All in one app.

Start Your Group